Cocks v state of queensland
WebTribunal, Cox v the State of Queensland. I understand Mr Cox, the complainant, is 5 present today. The case was about the Brisbane Convention Centre, which was then under construction, and which was designed with its main entrance to its foyer reached by a set of 27 steps. There was no means by which people with mobility WebCase: Indirect Discrimination - Attribute – Impairment - Type – Indirect –– Area - Services – Exemption – No – Liability - Government Liable Cocks v State of Queensland (1994) …
Cocks v state of queensland
Did you know?
WebAbstract: This article is a court decision from the Anti-Discrimination Board form a case between Kevin Cocks and the State of Queensland. The Board found in favour of the … WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADR 42 JM v QFG (1998) 1 Qd R 373 APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION: Applicant: D. O Gorman SC instructed by Robert Bax and Associates Respondent: C. Murdoch QC instructed by the Brisbane City Council REASONS FOR DECISION [1]Mr Yeo is a C4/C5 high level complete quadriplegic, and …
WebDec 5, 2016 · Wotton v State of Queensland (No 5) [2016] FCA 1457 (5 December 2016) Summary. Justice Mortimer in the Federal Court has ruled that the State of Queensland, acting through officers of the Queensland Police Service (QPS), engaged in unlawful discrimination under section 9(1) of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (RDA), in … WebQUEENSLAND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION CITATION: White v State of Queensland (Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service) [2024] QIRC 041 …
WebIn the case of Cocks v State of Queensland (1994), Kevin Cocks, a quadriplegia man in a wheel chair filed a case against the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre for not … WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADT 3 (Member Atkinson) access to premises (Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre) special services or facilities exemption; …
WebWik Peoples v The State of Queensland (commonly known as the Wik decision) is a decision of the High Court of Australia delivered on 23 December 1996 on whether …
WebForbes v Cocks. Shortened Case Name: Forbes v Cocks. Reported Citation: [1950] QWN 14. Court: QSC. Judge(s): Matthews J. Date: 27 Mar 1950. WELCOME TO THE … brookshire senior living hemetWebQueensland Ministerial Advisory Committee for Educational Renewal. (2004). Noel Pearson: Native tongues imperilled [Opinion]. Report on Indigenous education: … care homes great harwoodWeb304 views, 11 likes, 0 loves, 1 comments, 3 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from The Picture Club: The grand staircase at the main entrance of the Brisbane... brookshires ad longview txWebMay 7, 2024 · Robertson v State of Queensland [2024] QCA 92 Fraser JA, McMurdo JA and Henry J 7 May 2024. Background. In the September 2024 edition of WorkCover Update, we shared a case study regarding the District Court of Queensland judgement of Robertson v State of Queensland [2024] QDC 185. Ms Robertson, made a claim for damages … care homes greenwichWebDELIVERED AT: Brisbane. HEARING DATE: 15 October 2004. JUDGES: de Jersey CJ, McMurdo P and Chesterman J. Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, de Jersey CJ and Chesterman J concurring as to the orders made, McMurdo P dissenting. ORDERS: In Appeal No 6045 of 2004, Appeal No 6046 of 2004, Appeal No … care homes great barrWebTribunal, Cox v the State of Queensland. I understand Mr Cox, the complainant, is 5 present today. The case was about the Brisbane Convention Centre, which was then … brookshires diboll txWebHaving performed poorly in his 2010 clinical exams also indicated the probability of limited success if an alternative assessment was provided to Sklavos Cocks v State of Queensland (1994) In the case of Cocks, the requirement that patrons with mobility impairments enter the newly constructed Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre … brookshire senior living lawrenceville n